Wigan V Man City

Wigan athletic V Manchester City in the English FA cup final on the 11^th of May 2013, the first that I heard about it was on the morning after, soon after I thought of David beating Goliath as an accurate analogy. Then after that thought my mind turned to the last time that this happened 5 years ago/2008 those 5 years have been a catastrophic 5 years for our previous David’s as they, Portsmouth, haven’t just been relegated to the league  below them once, which should mean to the championship, nor twice, which should mean to league one, but 3 times all the way down to league 2 now if they keep this up they will be in non league territory But that was won against Cardiff City and Cardiff City hasn't exactly won the premier league as Manchester City has so that could be positive news for Wigan athletic, only time can tell.

Skiing Fails Recorded and put on YouTube

I have put the YouTube Video bellow on this website today as it brings back some memories, mainly of me stacking  it in Austria when I was skiing something like between 6 and 9 years ago.



The next video that I am about to put on this page was my first and so far only video contribution that I have made and published on YouTube to this date, it's an old video from 2007, it's only had 2,152 views on it and that has been on YouTube for slightly more than 6 years, I think it's 6 years and 24 days, I think you'll notice the size of the two videos.




But how did the top video remind me of the bottom video simply as the bottom video was filmed on the last time  that I went to Austria to skiing, and I think that I stacked it quite a lot on my last time that I went skiing,

Stacking it was the term that people used for fails, at least when I went skiing.

Most hated American family?

I am talking about the patriarch of the Westboro Baptist Church, Mr, Fred Phelps, and his rabble I get the title from Louis Theroux's TV program The Most Hated Family in America, which I found quite disturbing because the children don't even know what a Fag is?

fags  3rd person singular present, plural of fag(Noun)

Noun offensive. A male homosexual. A cigarette.

Anyway in that description it doesn't say anything about a female being a fag and the number 2 description of Fag is what I thought they meant when I first saw their signs, saying god hates fags, and if it did mean god hates cigarettes I may have to state that's the first thing that I have in common with it, as I hate the smell of cigarettes and you could watch "The Most Hated Family in America" documentary by clicking on the below YouTube videos/









I know that there isn't an 8 of 8 well at least none that I could find and as Louis says at the end of 7 of 8 "my time among the hate mongers of the Westboro Baptist Church was done" with that being said i'm guessing it's over. And the dangers of indoctrination rear their heads once more.

Parkour or free running

First off where did first hear/see about this topic?

Well the first time that I first heard about this topic, this topic being Parkour was many years ago, back when I was 11; I think.

What is Parkour?

Parkour is basically the best fun ever to come out of France and it is a sport that was covered in the bellow you tube videoand i wanted a go, as I saw the below video.



But I do not believe that I could do any of the tricks at least not any more, especially because of what happened to me back on the 3rd of July 2007, and was in a coma for the rest of July and I came out of the coma September time apparently and then I went to rehab which i was at for 6 months and that is when I actually woke up/my memories begin again, with Lucy, John, Kate, Chris and Penny and then a little later Tony, Sheila and the  other personally unnameable folks came into my memory

Why am I thinking this topic now?

It is for the very simple idea it is why doesn't the BBC to celebrate 50 years of running/Doctor Who with a great run of London? as if instead of doing a Jump London they could do a Run London and the BBC could potentially run a run around the areas in London that have been used to set Doctor Who at, like run from the BBC's main offices to Canary Wolf, the Powell estate, to the London Eye, the royal hope hospital, the globe and all of the other places in London that the Doctor has visited. It could be like a Journey through the footsteps of the Time-lord. So you could do it as a tourist attraction to get more capital going into the shops of Britain, well London and the BBC could rent out some of it's old London offices as sort of places to stay before going on the tour for some of the forrign visitors or local visitors or you could rent out some of your building space as function rooms.

Look at those ideas they tackle the obesity problem and the deficit problem, all from using one of the greastest succsess of the BBC that is Doctor Who..

Was presenter sacked for unfortunate slip of the tongue?

Was presenter sacked for unfortunate slip of the tongue?

I am typing about this today as I did tactually forget what I was about to post on this website and I thought that this news story was amusing I'm meaning if you click on the link above and then if you clicked upon the video you get to view the funny moment, By no means what so ever did she deserve to be fired from her job for the sake of that one little mistake; I think it could be classed as a freudian slip, it's a little excessive like some of the bible punishments which included stoning people and cutting off the hand(s) of the accused. 

Why in all Savageness...

Why in all Savageness is there such thing as a religion of peace and why is that title reserved for Islam?

First up we've got the question of why there's such thing as a religion of peace? As I do not know a decent reason without using the religious texts as literal factual account of what actually happened in the beginning times of this planet or flat piece of earth if you take the biblical account or the

So the first part of that question I believe deserves prescience over the second, partially as it concerns everyone more than the second and partially as I don't have an answer to the second, yet, so I am like a blind man feeling his way through land mined filled land attempting not to touch a mine, on the second part of the question.

So now back on to the main topic which is why in all Savageness is there such thing as a religion of peace? As it is the general modern-day consensus that peace is now one of the only bridges that we still need to cross a sustained global peace, so we can help feed all of the starving people, around the world then we could start an actual proper exploration of space and then we could start populating this solar system and perhaps more and the computer systems would need to be upgraded to manage the extra quick speeds who knows what we will evolve into from travelling if we were travelling through space at unheard of speeds towards our modern day knowledge.

That would be thanks to science no thanks to any religion .

Now I shall continue on to my second question why is that title reserved for Islam? Hang on a couple of minutes but it's all about peace you may communicate to me like how one of my Muslim friends did to me and then I site some examples from the Qur'an which didn't look very peaceful to me like Qur'an 4:76 as it says

"Those who believe fight in the cause of Allah , and those who disbelieve fight in the cause of Taghut. So fight against the allies of Satan. Indeed, the plot of Satan has ever been weak."

So that quote above is literally asking you to fight me, some religion of peace asking you to fight people that don't believe as you do.but one of friends, the one that hadn't told me "I think you should stop the with the questions coz your not understanding it" told me to search for Dr Zakir Naik Which led to a previous post entitled Is Dr Zakir Naik a liar? and I had a slight discussion on that topic- with myself, but I can't remember what my verdict on him being a liar was if I reached one, but I would imagine that he is a convicted liar.

Shall I compare you to?

Should I compare you to a summers day or a kiss from a rose?

Shall I compare thee to a summer's day? (Sonnet 18) by William Shakespeare

Baby, I compare you to a kiss from a rose on the grey (Kiss from a Rose) by Seal

Both of them go into more detail about what they mean at later times in their work. but I'm tempted to make a separate post or two up after this one as I'm just going to comment on the first two lines in each for now but this stuff is fun.

William Shakespeare: Sonnet 18
Shall I compare thee to a summer's day? 
Thou art more lovely and more temperate. 

I'm guessing as within William Shakespeare's eighteenth Sonnet I would be thinking what am I too hot, sweaty and uncomfortable as that is what I link the term summers day with, but thankfully he clarifies his meaning in the next sentence "Thou art more lovely and more temperate." now I disagree with this statement as it states you are more lovely, no I'm not, I'm about as lovely as nothing (the space between the planets) any one of my readers may be but me, NO!!!!

Seal: Chorus
Baby, I compare you to a kiss from a rose on the grey
Ooo, the more I get of you, the stranger it feels, yeah

And now to seal First off Mr Seal I am not your baby, but if I was wouldn't it be puppy you're calling out; as you are Mr Seal but don't seals have pups as their young not babies? Kiss from a Rose can roses kiss now I thought they were flowers and therefore they didn't have lips, so how are they going to kiss you? on the what, the grey; what is the grey? The more that I get of you? Meaning, in which way? The stranger it feels? And your telling me this why I think I can tell, yeah.

Has Britain become more Xenophobic?

I don't know about the whole of Britain but in the small corner of the small corner of Britain that I live it seems that way to me (I know that Britain isn't a square, I was typing hypothetically or metaphorically one of the two anyway)  but now I think about it it may not be just an isolated incident alas the whole of the UK may have been suffering from this epidemic turning it into a pandemic; equivalent to the small pox virus, the bubonic plague or even more exactly like the most prevalent pathogen to have ever cursed our weak human forms the one that is religion, under the the guise of giving us all an eternity of bliss if you believe, but how would you spend your eternity? there is only a finite number of things that you can do so what are you going to do when you've completed everything, or is it the heaven that the bible speaks of where you can't do anything but praise god if that's the case you may just throw me into hell as what is life if it is eternal?

Answer: It is not life it's torment in my opinion.

.So back on topic what is Xenophobia just if you wanted to know

Xenophobia  

Zene-fobia Definition: it is the irrational dislike or fear of people from other countries So therefore Xenophobic means that you are suffering from Xenophobia so you can tell what Xenophobic means now, can't you? Yes ? Good now let me continue because the UK's Xenophobic party (UKIP, I only state that because UKIP stands for United Kingdom Independence Party which means the same) because we have had some  local elections recently, aka yesterday, But within the seats that have already been called both the Labrats and UKipper have done the best in gaining seats from the Conservateeth and the Liberal  Democats parties. Party Councils Councillors Total Change+/- Total Change+/- Conservative 5 -2 201 -66 Liberal Democrat 0 0 73 -15 Labour 0 0 42 30 United Kingdom Independence Party 0 0 42 42 Independent 0 0 20 6 Green Party 0 0 3 2 Residents Association 0 0 1 1 Vacant 0 0 1 0 British National Party 0 0 0 0 English Democrats 0 0 0 0 Idle Toad Party 0 0 0 0 Independent Community and Health Concern 0 0 0 0 Liberal 0 0 0 0 Mebyon Kernow 0 0 0 0 No Overall Control 3 2 N/A N/A

Ok so it looks like a bad day at the polls for the Conservateeth and the Liberal Democats parties but if you would like to see the official up to date version of the poll results then please travel to this website, it's called the BBC

Good old Magret Thathcer/a tribute to the iron lady

(

Now this should be how politics should still be done.

So I am thing that another one of the big 3 political party (if there are such things any more) I'm referencing the Liberal Democats, the Labrats and the Conservateeth. As the Liberal Democats seem to have lost some supporters with nick Clegg actually doing what was best for the country in going into a coalition with the Conservateeth,

And all that there is left to state is...



and this I know it may be a bit late as a tribute, but it's a tribute none the less, well at least for this blog post. 

When It Was Dark- 1904 book

You know some books are being made into films like the Harry Potter series, The Da Vinci code, The Wizard of OZ, The Twilight series, Lord of The Rings trilogy (which was originally 6 books), The Chronicles of Narnia, Charlotte's Web and Holes, to name a few.

But what does this have to do with When It Was Dark other than it is a book they're all the names of books.

They have al been made into films except When It Was Dark, of which I'm reading at the moment it was recommended by Christopher Hitchens, when he was alive, so I am going to read through it.

Turning it into a script as I go if now I know that I have 4 voices but all 4 of them are computerised so then as soon as I have finished the script for the audio version I will then send it around to all those who have been cast to play the parts, so have I got any volunteers to cast into any roles, for the audio version?

No of course not.

Clones

Clones are real.
I know that identical twins are in fact clones, as that is all a clone is; a biological organism that shares the physical traits of another.
But which one is the real person and the other one is a clone? Or are they both real people so if you had a clone I'm not meaning a identical twin like Boba Fett was from Jango Fett what would you do to your clone that you wouldn't do to yourself, if anything?

Today we had a visit...

Today we had a visit from the Jehovah’s, and I wasn’t able to answer the door to them unfortunately my younger sister did and she didn’t tell me to come downstairs to talk/type to them about their beliefs but Alice was saying that I get to aggressive and all of that baloney as they were talking to her about domestic violence.

And what the bible says on domestic violence, and they read a quote from the bible condemning domestic violence which was probably Colossians 3:19 ESV; Husbands, love your wives, and do not be harsh with them. Which is basically a way of saying husbands don’t be dicks to your wives, but I think it missed out the part about wives beating their husbands as well; but that’s ok, apparently.
and they gave her two booklets one was about An end to domestic violence which I shall read another time but the second booklet caught my eye it was called "The Watchtower- Announcing Jehovah's kingdom" and just underneath that it said "A meaningful life is possible" One of the first thing that I thought when I saw this was yes despite the considerable efforts of the religious to under-mind the scientific progress and put us back into an age of darkness with some of there out right lies due to the true nature of consciousness and their paradoxes of thinking, But I can't type on a personnel note as I do not know any Jehovah's at least none that have openly told me about their belief but I'm thinking that my older sister had a friend that was a Jehovah's witness but i can't remember that for certain so I will have to ask her later on today, but i will get back to my audience/you, on that topic some other time.
But why did it say wives (which is the plural) meaning multiple wives not just one like the majority of Christians have their ideal wedding at 1 husband and one wife.

Faith

So I shall type about faith as I haven't ever typed about it before at least not on this, my blog, and I know that I have typed about faith in a higher power that some call God/Allah, but that false type of faith, by false type of faith I'm not meaning that you can't be sincere in your belief I am just typing about the verifiable evidence for it but that isn't what I'm typing about now.

I am typing about all the things that are real and they're in this plain of existence which can be faith in oneself or faith in a select group of people like your family, your friends, doctors, the police or the government. But I know that none of these four demand the kind of faith as the religions and they get even less respect than the religious fraudulent faiths, but i shall go into more detail on some of the real things that you could trust/put faith in which unlike religion actually have some basis in the real word.

Your family and friends you could trust to do quite a few things for you like make you laugh or cheer you up when you're in a bad mood.

Doctors why do you trust them you trust them to make you better if your ill which is unless you are part of a radical group that doesn't believe in modern medicines some believe that prayer should be the only medication.

 The police I'm not typing about the moron that you'd find in every occupation the ones that take it too far the ones that are bigger crooks than the people that they're there to protect you from, I mean a nice by the book police man/woman.

Government I know that you've probably had some problems with this structure throughout the years as everyone has except the youngest in society but but the governments job is to literally run a country, of course they're going to make some mistakes like Tony Blair's mistake of going to war along side of the USA, and basically Britain hasn't full recovered from that lapse in his judgement.But the government has actually been beneficial in my opinion, as Tony Blair wasn't a bad man he just made that stupid mistake like removing a card from the base in a house of cards it fell flat. 

What is my opinion on the method of science?

My opinion of the scientific method is that it is one of the best, if not the best, of determining what is the truth.

Now when I refer to the scientific method I mean the method which includes the principles and the procedures for a systematic and grounded investigation into knowledge, which involves the recognition of a and the piecing together a problem, and the data which can be sighted as evidence of it the data is collated by observation and experiment, and the formulation and testing of a hypotheses.

It's sort of like a backwards way that religion works please note that I have stated stated the two words "sort of" in bold and I have done this because they both start with a problem but then this is where the religious and science shift paths because in both cases the problem is life where did it come from the religious generally say it came from a deity that has always existed outside of our perceptions and as we as humans must have a designer as a computer has a designer ext.

Well to that statement the commonly asked question by atheists is who created the creator as if he is such a master piece within himself, then by the logic that you used he must have a creator as if us flawed beings were created by an entirely powerful entity then there must logically be a higher power than your deity and then it just goes on and on, to the next level continually to wards an infinity.

I will transform the problem above in some basic mathematics as we are living in our universe one of 3 dimensions hight, width, length but it is possible to imagine what life is like in 2 dimensions something like Link in the 2D Zelda games only being restricted to those two directions. But with a world of 4D how would you know where to start they're outside of our comprehension. so for all we know we may just be a series of nodes in a computer while we're on we're alive when we are off we die and when we are no longer being used by the computer matrix we are asleep we have been put onto hibernate, earth is basically the internet/the greatest source of knowledge known to us; the internet is only a repository to store and share the knowledge that you have learnt.

So your religion is saying that we are 3D creatures and God is a 4D creature and just he was created by a 5D creature and then 6D, 7D, 8D, 9D and it just continues.

Why do the Gospels not count? Part 1

Now how do you verify that that the gospels are accurate without having alternative sources? As for a fact that both of the gospels of Matthew and Luke as within them they each tell the story of Jesus (even if he should be called Immanuel) But then both of the two tales are not the same they in actual fact are contradictory and the story that we have been told at school or Church is a hybrid tale of the two, read my below abridged versions of the two tales you can read them both for yourself to disprove them if you so wished; But this is my proof that the gospels don’t count; as they can’t,

The book of Matthew: Joseph already lives in Bethlehem, Angel came down to Joseph and they tell him to call the baby Jesus, 3 Magi (Wise men) that followed a star in the east, another angel comes to Joseph and warns him of Herod and tells Joseph to get into Egypt, king Herod dies Jesus goes to Nazareth to become the Nazareth,

The book of Luke: Mary lives in Nazareth, Angel came down to Mary tells her to call it Jesus, Caesar Augustus declared a census so all men had to go back to their ancestral homes which was the reason for Joseph going to Bethlehem, but no room in the inn so they had to get lodge in the stable, the Angel goes to shepherds and tells them about the baby, then the shepherds go to Mary, a week later the baby is called Jesus, they took him from Bethlehem to Jerusalem, then they returned to Nazareth.

Above this text you probably have read my two abridged versions of the bible tale of how, potentially, your Lord Jesus was born, so in this paragraph I shall go into how they taught me it at a Church of England school, when I was younger. They said that within the year that would run up towards the 25th of December of the year of 1 AD, there's at least one fabrication towards the story which was the date as where in the 2 books of the bible does it mention the date? Before that point they said at my school that an angel came down to Mary and then Joseph which is like a Frankenstein version of the two separate versions and then the tale that the emperor of Rome did decree that their was to be an empire wide census with all of the citizens of Rome having to go back to the places of their birth, which was mentioned in Luke but not in Matthew was there even a census for the complete Roman empire with Caesar Augustus at the helm of it? I am not sure about it but if it was true then only Joseph would have to go to back to his ancestral home not Mary, so she could just stay at home while Joseph was on the road to Bethlehem within Luke I am not asking you to abandon your faith, I am just asking you to verify the facts before you start spouting off and defending a position that is indefensible, by the very books that people preach from, and they just go on about how it must be taken on faith.

Caesar Augustus reigned as emperor of the Roman empire from 27 BC to 14 AD which means that the authors of these book had got the correct Roman empire for the time that this supposedly took place, but Herod the Great died 4 BC so he couldn't have ordered the execution of all of the babies in Bethlehem, 

That isn't all that I could state to prove my point that the Gospels don't count but it's a start but I am planning to complete this at some other time.

So a Time Lord has 13 lives...

So a Time Lord has 13 lives and the Doctor is on his eleventh regeneration by the time of Matt Smith so their is only two regenerations left at the time that he melded himself with the ten regenerations that River Song had left over, so does that get The Doctor twenty one or twenty three.

Well how many regenerations did River Song actually have I thought she was on her third, so then ten given to the Doctor, as the first regeneration was after she was shot by Amy, River Song as a young child/the one below that has got a crack in her helmet. Then she regenerates into her second form which is the one to the right hand side of the previously mentioned  picture but then her next regeneration is triggered by the gun that is shot by Hitler but their wasn't any contact between the bullets and River; was their? As I can't see how the bullets hit her didn't Hitler shoot all of the bullets at the Teselecta unless he was a terrible shot which it didn't look like  as the Teselecta seemed to take the brunt of impact of the bullets that were being shot at him by Hitler, so how and why did she actually regenerate into the one that is River Song from the day of the Tenth Doctor and from all of the after episodes.

But then within River Song short on screen life it looks like a Time Lord can influence their future regenerations by thinking, and they don't age at the same rate as us they each seem to have a personally independent growth rates, as River number 2 Says she's focusing on a dress size and then she goes and transforms into Alex; the top one on the the picture. But from the first generation of River Song as she was a young girl in her first form 1969 (the year of the moon) but then we see at the end of that episode we see her regenerating but we don't know what year that regeneration place in all we know is that it was in-between 1969 and Amy Pond's/her mothers birth but then she'd be having to live in that time stream for 24 years until She can go to school with her mother, and then she'd have to re-engage her growth hormones to get her to act as if she was the same age as Amy, then.

Conclusions I have gathered from the above case study are that Time Lords can control their regenerations to a certain extent and they can also control the speed at witch they each age, or was that just River Song that can do all of those things?

Is Dr Zakir Naik a liar?

Dr Zakir Naik is someone that is a defender of the Islamic faith now I searched for him on the request of a friend of mine, so I did and this was the first result that I clicked on:




When he answered the question: if a person that was born a Muslim (how absurd you can't be born to believe a certain way, but I think what she is meaning is that if a person that was born of a Muslim family) Should be punished by death.

Then Dr Zakir said that he doesn't know of any verse in the Qur'an which is understandable as all of us are only human you can't have memorised the whole book, it's a long book and he asks her to point out in the Qur'an where is it? If she could have answered his question with the answer of Surat An-Nisā' 4:89 as in that  passage of the Qur'an goes exactly like this

"They wish you would disbelieve as they disbelieved so you would be alike. So do not take from among them allies until they emigrate for the cause of Allah . But if they turn away, then seize them and kill them wherever you find them and take not from among them any ally or helper."

Which states quite clearly not to take their lives from them until they emigrate from the cause of Allah which I'm assuming is Islam. So that means you lied Dr Zakir Naik, not about the part where you said that you had never read a verse in the Qur'an. But then later on in the video he said that we all are born a Muslim so then by his own logic every person that doesn't state that they believe in Allah is going to Jahannam/Hell.

So I'm attempting to understand how...

So I'm attempting to understand how a book which I thought was the foundational building blocks of any modern-day religion can openly state that if you believe in their type of superstitious nonsense you are going to have to be willing to fight for it, sounds a little bit like a passage from the old testament, and all those that don't believe the way that you do you should fight the the case of the false leader, and then it goes onto state that you should fight against the allies of Satan, so that passage immediately means it can't be out of the old testament, as there was no Satan in that book, anyway what is Satan if not a made up personification of our darker sides which we all  have.
I shall now reveille the actual statement and it was from the Qur'an, Surat An-Nisa (The Women) 4:76-

Those who believe fight in the cause of Allah , and those who disbelieve fight in the cause of Taghut. So fight against the allies of Satan. Indeed, the plot of Satan has ever been weak.
How can any religion that openly holds that oppionion within the pages of a "sacred" text be considered the religion of peace I don't know.

Is Disney ready?

This is a serious question for the biggest joke that's in the film making industry, and I mean that seriously 

As Disney it is one of the biggest film making companies, if not the biggest, and I meant joke as in why has it decided to pay over 4 billion pounds for a film franchise that the initial creator of it has already said that no more film shall be made out of the series, so now you've probably got about half of those die hard fans really peeved about now by Disney announcing that a new star wars trilogy is going to put into production which is only logical as they just paid a total of $4.05 billion for Lucas films which is a lot of money, as George Lucas, the founder of Lucas films, is set to retire/has already retired. 

^{You suppose it's going to do better for the franchise as it will get the series more fans?} 

^{That as good as it sounds I don’t think more fans is what Star Wars needs, it didn’t really need anything else to go down as one of the greatest film series in history. But some of my other friends that were Star Wars fans with me when we were in infants/juniors school, if those terms are alien to you they were the two sections that were reformed into primary I know what I have written before may look a little condescending but it isn't intended to be that way.}

Anyway I do not think that the Disney princesses are ready for princess Leia as I’m unsure if you know what Princess Leia was wearing during the begging of episode VI; The Return of the Jedi, that hyper skimpy outfit. As I get it that Disney is attempting to change the definition of a Disney princess from Snow White, Cinderella types of people, basically the Damsel in Distress routine as that was the old basic tenant of basically all Disney Princess films but I have seen Brave/the newest Disney Princess film and the princess Merida who seemed to have a sincerely toned down version of Leia. But she stays fully dressed aka not in a skimpy bikini type thing for all of her film (and the fact that she was an animated character).

I'm just lucky that I'm not one of those hard-core fans that aren't waiting to slate Disney when it doesn't meet their expectations another proportion nor am I one of those equally hard-core fans that enjoyed the original trilogy so much that the prequel trilogy didn't do the original series justice, I may have to warn you that my two favourite Star Wars films are episode VI the Return of the Jedi and episode II the Attack of the Clones. 

Which brings me onto the question that I started off with which is “is Disney ready to have this tremendous gauntlet passed on to them?” Well I am unsure if it should had taken up this certain gauntlet especially with the Disney Princess issue as mentioned earlier in this article, but Disney has also bought the rights to some of Marvels films and the one that has been seen by me, the Avengers, it was pretty fantastic, so I don’t want to be disappointed by any of the future trilogies of Star Wars by those people at Disney. So Disney do not whatever you do put princess Leia in the damsel in distress role.

What in Obama's Name was Mr Obi-Man talking about

Mr Obi-Man I mean Mr Obama and I be typing about the epic fail that he made in the below video clip.

I am saying that he made an epic fail because he did, enacting two separate Sci-Fi epics and combining them the first of which was the Jedi of Star wars fame and the second was the Vulcan mind meld but he spoke of Jedi Mind melds when every one should know that there is no such thing as a Jedi Mind Meld in any of the current 6 Star Wars films it's Mind Tricks that the Jedi use.

Oh how you disappoint me Mr Obi-Man, I'm so glad that it's not you that is running the country that I am living in..

When does life start? & Engage the Freak Part 1

I have decided to make this topic another one of my more sincere posts. not that I'm not sincere when I'm usually writing but now I'm not writing a story. for the length of this post; and I'm saving my plans for the Great British monarchy for later another time or date (I haven't decided yet), but I believe that this can be a controversial topic of discussion with some people saying that life starts at conception so if you or I killed a pregnant woman you or I should be sentence to have killed one plus how ever many babies that were in her uterus, but then others believe that it starts at birth, which I think is more plausible.
Now I know what you could think about this half theory conspiracy theory but it's with my mission to be more open minded to all possibilities irrespective of how slim or vast they could be, so here goes.

Engage the Freak Part 1: :how do you know that yesterday happened? Memories, the additional couple of bits of wear and tear, the decreasing storage space on your computing devices, and finally your progression throughout other things like games.
There's actually no reason for yesterday even happening it could have just been put in my head by some other freak (my definition of the word freak please read the final paragraph), this very moment may be unreal but the only thing that I am certain of is that I am conscious at the moment but I could be mistaken I just won't ever know, unless this is an elaborate dream state that I am in.

Discounting that freaky little discourse and getting back onto the initial question of when does life start I guess that you are going to decided for yourselves but me being the freak that I am going to have to say that my lufe didn'tmay have started at my birth but that was just the chemicals that formed me.

Freak is what I am and what everyone is even if your not a real persons conciseness how are we to know any difference, which leads onto the question of what's real? then you may state anything that can be touched or felt then by that definition the internet is defined as unreal, so is everything that is stored on your computer, so then my life is basically unreal.

Royal Line of succession

Now you may be aware of a television programme called the game of thrones, and about how the king shouldn't be the king as he is the product of two siblings but as it just so happened that one of the siblings was the queen, by marriage. So there's an illegitimate king on the throne,
But that isn't what I want to type about today as that is all their own business what I would like to type about in this post is the line of succession; and more importantly what would happen if a king died and he had no legitimate offspring to pass down the crown to but he had siblings and a bastard child.
So who would the Crown pass to? would it be the siblings or the bastard? All help with the answer to my question would be appreciated.