Then there was this email that I received which stated “Terrorist or unstable?” As it was reporting on a story about someone shouting"Allahu Akbar" as he drove his car into pedestrians and cyclists in France, and I was thinking both as to be a follower of the religion of Islam you have to have a screw loose and you are a terrorist, by definition. I know that some people that purport themselves to be peaceful Muslims but have they read their own book that they supposedly follow to the letter? When it tells them to kill or enslave (subjugate) all unbelievers as it says:
[9.29] Fight those who do not believe in Allah, nor in the latter day, nor do they prohibit what Allah and His Apostle have prohibited, nor follow the religion of truth, out of those who have been given the Book, until they pay the tax in acknowledgment of superiority and they are in a state of subjection.
Now from that passage I finally understand why the political “left” loves Islam, just one word “tax”, it’s a political ideology that extracts tax from people that don’t believe as they do such a “powerful” incentive for those that believe that power is money as the “left” does.
Now that I have just gone off on a semi-related tangent back to my point of terrorist or unstable, how about both?
No comments:
Post a Comment