So I'm attempting to understand how a book which I thought was the foundational building blocks of any modern-day religion can openly state that if you believe in their type of superstitious nonsense you are going to have to be willing to fight for it, sounds a little bit like a passage from the old testament, and all those that don't believe the way that you do you should fight the the case of the false leader, and then it goes onto state that you should fight against the allies of Satan, so that passage immediately means it can't be out of the old testament, as there was no Satan in that book, anyway what is Satan if not a made up personification of our darker sides which we all have.
I shall now reveille the actual statement and it was from the Qur'an, Surat An-Nisa (The Women) 4:76-
Those who believe fight in the cause of Allah , and those who disbelieve fight in the cause of Taghut. So fight against the allies of Satan. Indeed, the plot of Satan has ever been weak.
How can any religion that openly holds that oppionion within the pages of a "sacred" text be considered the religion of peace I don't know.
I shall now reveille the actual statement and it was from the Qur'an, Surat An-Nisa (The Women) 4:76-
Those who believe fight in the cause of Allah , and those who disbelieve fight in the cause of Taghut. So fight against the allies of Satan. Indeed, the plot of Satan has ever been weak.
How can any religion that openly holds that oppionion within the pages of a "sacred" text be considered the religion of peace I don't know.
No comments:
Post a Comment