My search for answers could you please Define:Love

So I have been looking at some art, today. There was the following quotation beside of it "Love is just a word until somebody comes along and gives it meaning" by Paul Coelho, to this you may say so are all the other words that describe anything, but that is the nature of a word. A word is a word spoken, a spoken word are the noise's that you make/articulate with your voice box which are used as a tool of communication, or written, written communication is stuff that have been written down for someone, I.E. you; to read like this blog has got plenty of stuff for you to read; yes for you, everybody that can and would like to read, to read. If you'd like to see the picture that the quote is assigned to you can see it here

But actually on topic now what I would like is your personal definition of what Love is so that I can make my mind up on the topic because I am confused again as once upon a time I thought love was the human definition of attraction between a male and a female, but you could guess that I was wrong, but then I thought that it was a little bit more general as in love was the definition of the attraction between two living creatures living creatures but that went out of the proverbial window a long time ago, probably as a result of the preposterous allegations of the nature of love, and then I thought love was the feeling the definition of the attraction that two or more creatures can feel for anything which is governed by a feeling of pleasure within themselves, which can be as a result of hormones and pheromones playing havoc within oneself.

But none of those definitions seem to be globally acceptable so that is why I ask you, everyone that reads this diatribe, please define love.

Clones

Cloning a human/very intresting stuff

Scientific stuff

What have I done on Science?

Evolution

I was loooking for something more on Evolution

More on Evolution

My basic explanation of bang theory Part 1

My basic explanation of bang theory Part 2

Some things about Chemistry and the chemistry of romance

A bit on Chemistry

Well I'm unsure if all of you have heard of the band My Chemical Romance, I should think so as they were labelled as an Emo band and some years ago so called Emo bands were cool weren't they? I haven't got the slightest clue what an Emo band is within the context of My Chemical Romance; I know what an Emo is supposed to be (they are supposed to be suicidal people, aren’t they), but I find they're music uplifting not depressive.

I was thinking about the name in relation to my science week or my previous 7 days of the stuff and I have just been thinking as I have covered a bit on biology and and I started a bit on physics and just I thought what could I do on chemistry and but I figured the awesome band, My Chemical Romance, <.p> So you could just say what about that band, apart from the scientific name in the middle anyway what about the name is not scientific? Would be my counter question.

As what about romance isn’t due to chemicals like hormones and pheromones and biochemical reactions.

I found a website which can explain it better than me:

“Physical attraction is the result of the body's reaction to each other's pheromones and hormones.” I quote the prior text from this web space .

Which I shall paraphrase the rest of the text.

testosterone is produced by the female if she sees, smells, hears or practically any other sense, and pheromones are playing a .very important role in this stage.

A feeling of lust is an actual chemical charge from inside of a body. As are the feelings of being romantic or being romanced or the feelings that you get in some relationships.

My basic explanation of the bang theory part 2

Ok so where was in my basic explanation of the bang theory,

I remember now I was just informing you people about all of the elements and how they formed. I was about to inform you of how the stars are thought to have been formed.

The stars are made out of Hydrogen, Helium, Oxygen, Carbon, Neon and Nitrogen atoms.

Now so when a star is created you’ve got all of the mentioned above particles joining up and once they have collided and gathered enough energy to become a star, they burst into stars. But of the stars probably are the only natural places in the universe where the quarks get “built” into the basic chemical elements, but then you can transfer the quark between items by doing a thing as simple as switching a light switch as from only my basic, truly elementary, understanding of physics as in electrons are relatively abundant in which are negatively charged with the electrical charge passing throughout the atoms within the electrons, which are attached. <\p>

Now that should be it for the stars which were logically created before the planets not as how the majority of Christians and biblical realists, by the way by biblical realists I mean all of the people that think what happened in the bible was real. But yes I know they’re really difficult to understand but that’s why I am attempting to understand the mind set up of one that is very nice. Yes she told me that it could have been the big bang that created god (she was going to ask her priest yesterday), But then I used facey book’s personal message system to tell her of the blatant contradictions she’s Roman Catholic as my Irish Grandma is/was, the Romans were very interesting in accordance to their faiths, but I shall write about them at some other time.

Then after the stars had been formed planets were created within the outer areas of stars, so then henceforth the rocks each less than half the size of the sun at its birth but as the sun uses more of its finite number of particles they can create some more within its self but as its fuel which keeps it running winds down to next to nothing and where does all of the energy that it created by the stars end up? well the majority of it is wasted as light and heat energy which guessing I shouldn’t call it wasted energy as it is highly incremental to our being here today on earth. The heat as it would be almost as cold as in outer space and the light else wise it’d be like living in complete darkness and you wouldn’t be able to see anything the human race would be like a mole in the vision respect.

More Sciency stuff

Now this isn't about My basic explanation of the bang theory but instead it's going to be me hosting an interesting episode of the Sci Show It's about parasites that live inside of the Homosapien orgasm,

My basic explanation of the bang theory part 1

The big bang theory as far as I can tell was caused from the natural process of time which eroded over the first sub atomic particles to exist which were a series of up of protons, neutrons and elections; actually I think that they may have been smaller than that are called quarks.

But then all of the sub atomic particles were super condensed “down” to a small size at the centre of the universe and then every atom of your personal body was separated, everything that is of physical form now and ever was meaning that you could be eating some atoms which was a part of the space station at one point, as there are only a finite number of atoms within this universe.

“For the time being at least, at least until something can re-create the perfect conditions for the big bang but couldn’t that that destroy us all?”

Well I don’t know if creating another big bang inside of the known universe would destroy it or just create a new universe inside of it, but I know that I shall have to find out.

The sub atomic particles were just “standing” around if they could stand around which they couldn’t do as they don’t have any legs, they’re just some inert particles at this time, before the time concept which has been established which is due to the earth rotating when I haven’t even gotten around to explaining all the stars yet.

But when the subatomic particle moved around they brushed against each other generating friction and then bang all of the sub atomic particles gained enough energy, which forced them to expand and to join up in to atomic structures like Fe 26/ 55.845. if you’d like to find out more about the atomic structure of Iron Periodic table element Fe 26/55.845 click here.

More evolutioon

So I just wanted to put up this on my blog it's a bit more about evolution, but it's just here before I go a onto my physics understanding in the (the big bang theory).

I was looking for some more Evolution stuff

Well I was looking for some Evolution stuff on YouTube and I found this video about the misconceptions some of us human beings have had on the subject, are having about evolution and I hadn't mentioned most of it in my last post, about evolution, so here goes, now send in the Crocoducks.

More lunacy from over the pond

By the pond I mean the Atlantic, yes it's America that I am on about.
It's about the senator of North Carolina's wife; who is a female Homosapien, I think?

"Anti-Gay Marriage Bill Created ‘To Protect Caucasian Race’ Says Senator’s Wife"

But I don't understand her logic how on earth or in fact any other planet in the universe will homosexuality effect your superiority complex over every other single colour of people on the planet?
Now your sounding a little bit like I'm sure Adolf Hitler did during the war.
Oh no it can't be happening again, can it?
Ok it's not no partner of a senator "can" have enough influence over who to go to war with next, can they?
Unless they work out a way of fertilising the sperm with another sperm or an egg with another egg, which the both of them are very unlikely to happen ever, verging over the line of impossible, as from my biology lessons you need two gametes one from a male, the sperm, and one from the female, the egg, and each one of them has 23 Chromosomes in each and both fuse/join together inside of the woman and they form a foetus and then approximately 9 months later you both get a child.
But then you've got In Vetro Fertilisation (IVF) but you still need female and male gametes.

My short explanation of evolution

The beginins of life as far as I understand

1^well as far as I understand it every biological life form started off as a singular cell. Now each of these singular cells are organisms, but if the conditions on the planet’s surface are correct as it was on earth all those thousands of millions of years ago, 4540 million years ago. Then all of the cells involved do a process called mitosis which is the nucleus (the genetic material which is inside of an cell) of a cell replicating; now what usually happens now is another process called cytokinesis/the splitting of cytoplasm (which is the property that surround and protects the nucleus) like how your skull protects your brain but it is less solid. But that is basically the origins of life

“But then how did we get so complex?”

2^Anyway what Darwin explains is that with every cell that “lives” it is going to make to make more replicas of itself now we all should know that practically nothings perfect, no not even a god concept is perfect it is always as flawed as its creator or creators, in some ways it may seem perfect and to some people but you just need to take an objective/impartial stance on the object of your fantasies then take another look at your fantasy and you’ll see that it’s as flawed it is, as the rest of us stuck here on this plane, for the time being at least.

...

3^Anyway back to your question where does all of this complicity come from, well it comes from the random mutations within the cell structure and then only the best survive, like a garden where only the brightest flowers attract the insects to come and pollinate them, else wise you’d get weeds which pollenate a different way and that is called natural selection e.g. the dinosaurs were the inhabitants of this planet before homo-sapiens came into existence, anyway while we may not exactly know what wiped them out but he human race has built up a theory, a scientific theory of what could have happened to them, which is that a meteorite collided with the earth which hit the atmosphere with such force that the sun was obscured and then all vegetation wouldn’t be able to grow and then all of the herbivores would be extinct as the vegetation has gone prior, then the carnivores would die out as where has the food source gone? Which only leaves the omnivores which would have die out along with they’re food sources, leaving the seas the seas as the only part to harvest life.

...

4^Then human evolution starts again but then with our ancestors, but I’m not meaning your Grandparents I mean the types of creature that still look like fish but they have grown slight legs, a tiny bit like a seal, but then as we reproduced every cell will have unique genetic data in it at conception and then mitosis and cytosols (check up the page if you have forgotten what these are) the random mutations which happen within genetic code created apes probably over 10 million year time frame give enough time to create apes but evolution is an on-going process so who knows what the homo-sapiens race will look like in the next 10 million years if our decedents are still called that if we don’t become extinct before then, please note I do not believe that we, as a species can survive, very much longer than the end of this century let alone 10 million years.

Penn and Teller:Holier Than Thou

This should be the last episode of Penn and Teller that I am broadcasting, today at least

And this one highlights two of the world’s greatest faith con-artists,

In terms of Mother Teresa, real name was Agnes Gonxha Bojaxhui, who was a religious zealot, As well as one of the greatest most bigoted people ever become a profit of a faith.

And yes he did exist

As he was Ghandi and just as proof that he existed you can see his grandson.

Phrases of wisdom from Penn and Teller

1. the enemy of my enemy is not my friend

2. The lesser of two evils is still evils

3. Remember this there is no such thing as holier than thou

4. And my favourite Christopher Hitchens saying

“Faith is the surrender of the mind, it's the surrender of reason, it's the surrender of the only thing that makes us different from other animals. It's our need to believe and to surrender our skepticism and our reason, our yearning to discard that and put all our trust or faith in someone or something, that is the sinister thing to me. ... Out of all the virtues, all the supposed virtues, faith must be the most overrated”

Penn and Teller: Creationism

It's time for another Penn and Teller religous satire,

But this timer it's about creation "science"

Penn and Teller: Bible, real facts?

Please watch this whole program and just remmber "Elvis did no drugs." but I do not know check for yourself: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elvis_Presley

Penn and Teller logically being speculative.

What is religion to you?

This is a list of all of the answers I have collated thus far;
But if you have a point of veiw on this topic please write it inside the comments section below, or alturuntly you coud pm me.
 

A place for weirdoes

A bunch of not provable stories giving people false hope

Nothing…

Religion is a means of explaining a belief and cultures of various groups of people

Something that gives people hope when they are down

It’s a thing that people can believe in to give them hope or something to help them guide their lives on.

A load of poo

Basically a whole load of socially excepted lies, and if you don‘t accept them as fact in some places of the world, like America (USA) or Iran, you could be killed or worse.

I am for the higher taxes..

I am for the higher tax rates on the churches it will get some more of the money that is horded by the churches in circulation and as all of these people like Harriet Harman, whom is the deputy leader of the labour party, was saying “that it’ll close down many of the churches, with them falling to pieces” as if it was a bad thing; of which I personally cannot see. 

But couldn’t God within his capacity, of being Omniscient and within all knowledge that comes with all of that foresee this entire eventuality and divinely intervene to save all of his churches? Or is it due to the fact that his powers are limited therefore him not being Omnipotent, and if it is Omnipresent meaning everywhere at once why has it not attempted to stop me from writing this work of a heretical nature and he hasn’t ever attempted to stop any of my teachers from passing on this crucial information that I pass on to you now, 

There is no god, now you could attempt to prove something adverse of that statements do not allow me to stop you. Just please allow me time to study the evidence and I’ll get back to you either disproving it or conceiving that you are correct like I have done with the statement that in the new testament some of the morals that “Jesus” states are moral but he advocates the murder of whole civilisations, from in the old testament. As if any supposedly morally righteous being would bother sending a human to any planet which has as large of history of violence within the species that inhabit it as this planet has which has generally been caused by the superstitious minds of the negligent masses, such as Harriet Harman.

And that leads me on to the forth of the Omni four that God supposedly is and it is the most fictitious of all, it’s the “Godly” capacity of Omnibenevolence or his all goodness/lovingness, where on earth is all of al goodness within any of the wars like the first World War and the second World War but how about the Libyan civil war and the 2012 South Sudan–Sudan border conflict or even within the many on-going wars aka conflicts? like the 2011–2012 Yemeni revolution, 2011–2012 Syrian uprising, Sudan internal conflict (2011–), War in Somalia (2009–present), 2011–2012 Libyan factional fighting, Tuareg rebellion (2012).

Well all of this typing about God has got me wondering what does the Bible teach about such matters, and what it does teach is the fiction that god is all 4 of these Omni properties which is in direct contradiction to my sense which could mean either one of two things. One that God is a character of theist’s imaginations and the Bible is just another book which was wrote a long time ago by people that just wanted power over the minds of the people whom served them. Two is that it just can’t be bothered anymore so it’s off someplace else doing better things with his time which is all time, oh yes it’s confusing how can have all time to do whatever it wants at any certain time and but it’s seeming doing nothing.

If you want an alternative (opposite) view on the Biblical teaching about God you could go to:

http://www.cogwriter.com/god-omnipotent-omniscient-omnipresent.htm

Have you ever heard the phrase...

Have you ever heard the phrase “There is no greater LOVE, than the LOVE one has for themselves”? of which I have just leant means “No one can know love until they know how to love themselves. Some people may serve themselves or even pretend to love themselves. But the truth reveals itself when you see how they treat themselves: the way they treat their bodies, the situations they put themselves in, things like that.” thank you Ana Thema for side stepping the initial question to give a brilliant objective answer click http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080304064859AAI5K3m to see the question and the many answers are just Christians explain their own personal beliefs and about how false the statement is. But What I would like to ask the theist nut jobs why if god loves all of his creations does he allow genocides as well as the multiple that he inflicted upon us in the bible? But all I can say about the biblical genocides is the facts that none of them actually happened, or if they did Your God friend is so good at cleaning up after himself, then he must have just have forgotten about the many different species of dinosaurs that he trapped under the surface of this planet’s “skin”, and I do not remember anything about dinosaurs underneath the earth that we live on in the bible.

Attempting to make sense of the bible

Yahweh isn't an upstanding figure of morality, if he was why did it kill every living thing on the planet, Genesis chapters 6-9 the "Great Flood" which is unverifiable. Now if say that you don’t believe that the flood actually happened then I would type that that I agree with you, but if there was ever a time, in the past that the complete surface of this planet was water it’d have been a lot longer time ago than the bible allows but that's enough about that particular part of the Genesis chapter I’ve still  got the first 5 chapters of the first sub book of the bible to go through before I get to Genesis chapter 6. 


So here goes...


Genesis chapter 1  the text surrounding verse numbers 1 and 2 It ia from the new international version of the bible:
“1 In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. 2 Now the earth was formless and empty, darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters.”

Just out of curiosity did the man that was writing this passage mean the sky? Not the literal heavens? Because if it did it would make more sense elsewise you have just annulled your very own judgement day concept, which may just be my personal perception of your, or just another, nonsense story book. Just a quick recap of the tall tale so far God has already created the heavens and the earth and that is it and he is still in darkness and the spirit of god is hovering over waters which he hasn’t yet created, so he didn’t create water? If that is so it means that water was here, in the vacuum of nothingness which we (human kind, most of us) call space before the Universe began now honestly that is unbelievable. 

Now I shall stop at that if you have an answer to my question or you could answer either of my questions please type it into the comments spot below, or if you have any other comments that could help me in my quest to understand these scriptures.

AV explained once more

Well I have just had AV explained yo me again by this CGP Grey character

andall I can say is that it seems fairer since you put it like this but I also like his honesty.

2150

2150 is the year that it has been said that this little rock in the great expanse of space shall hold its first global parliament, how do I know? It told me on star trek obviously. So it's just 138 more years until global unity under one power, but it could potentially be already if Hitler's plans succeeded but they didn't which is just as well they didn't otherwise I probably wouldn't be sitting down typing this today, I probably wouldn't exist. But if I live to 158/138 more years, which I highly doubt; besides I am hoping that I die long before then. Anyway Mr Adolf could be called the estranged uncle of our modern day morality for providing an almost perfect example of what not to do while you are alive, the oonly greater example is the God of the bible/the perfect example.